Share This Page

Westmoreland man charged with child pornography

| Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2013, 8:33 p.m.

A Westmoreland County man accused of using a camera to spy on girls in a South Side hotel now faces child pornography charges.

Pittsburgh police on Monday charged Louis Wilt, 58, of New Florence, with 10 counts of possession of child pornography after detectives discovered 78 images of pre-adolescent children on the laptop computer police seized upon his arrest this month.

Police arrested Wilt on Aug. 8 after two girls, both younger than 16, told police they were changing into their bathing suits in the bathroom of their room in the Sheraton at Station Square when they noticed a blinking red device with a tiny camera lens. One of the girls called her mother, who notified hotel security.

The woman told officers that she had seen the recording device on Wilt's keychain, and he told her it was for a garage door.

When she confronted him about the device after her daughter discovered it, he said it was a listening device he used because he wanted to hear what the girls said about boys and drinking alcohol, according to the criminal complaint filed against Wilt.

Police charged him with sexual abuse of children by videotaping and invasion of privacy, and he was ordered to stand trial at a preliminary hearing Aug. 16.

He is being held at the Allegheny County Jail on a $10,000 bond, online court records show.

Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.