Police probe North Huntingdon incident, fire
North Huntingdon police are investigating a Saturday morning fire that destroyed a small building at 2381 Scotch Hill Road No. 1 and temporarily closed the road, officials said.
Police said an incident involving an intoxicated man and a structure on fire was reported about 5:48 a.m. Several people and one fireman were taken to Forbes Hospital in Monroeville “as a result of the incident and fire,” according to a news release by Detective Sgt. Jeffrey Bouldin.
Police did not release the names of those injured or details about the nature of the incident.
No arrests have been made, police said.
Bill Hardy, chief of Larimer Volunteer Fire Department, said the original call was for a chicken coop fire, but when firefighters arrived, the structure appeared to be a small, two-story carriage house or out-building on the property.
“It was completely engulfed when we got there,” Hardy said. “It was a heck of a fire.”
Hardy said no one was inside the building when crews arrived.
Despite fire suppression efforts, Hardy said the structure was destroyed “down to the ground.”
Police said adjoining structures and a vehicle close to the fire were damaged.
North Huntingdon Twp. Police detectives and fire investigators are still working to determine the cause and source of the fire, police said.
Scotch Hill Road No. 1 was closed temporarily because of multiple emergency vehicles responding, according to an email alert from police about 7:20 a.m.
Police said the scene was cleared about 10:10 a.m.
Kari Andren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2856 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.