Pittsburgh is ticketing residents for parking in their own driveways
Pittsburgh building code officers are citing residents under an obscure and infrequently enforced ordinance that prohibits homeowners from parking in their own driveways without a $225 zoning variance and permit, two city council members said.
Residents who are ticketed typically are unaware of the ordinance until the Bureau of Building Inspection receives a complaint and notifies them, Councilman Corey O'Connor said. City officials say the ordinance has been on the books for years, and controversy crops up cyclically when officials issue citations.
BBI has cited or warned seven residents in his district on Hobart Street in Squirrel Hill, O'Connor said. Councilwoman Theresa Kail-Smith said the bureau issued 14 citations to Wind Gap residents in her district.
“When somebody's parked in their driveway for 30, 40 years and all of a sudden we're going to come out and give you a ticket, that's unfair,” O'Connor said.
Eileen Freedman, 45, and her husband parked in their Hobart Street driveway for 18 years before BBI issued a warning last month. They've since moved to a parking spot on the street.
“It's ridiculous, and it doesn't make our city look very smart,” Freedman said.
Residents must adhere to setback regulations to park in front of their home, whether it's in a driveway or “parking pad” in their yard, according to the ordinance. Setbacks are 30 feet from a property line bordering the street.
Residents must obtain a variance and permit from the city's Zoning Board of Adjustment at a cost of $225 to deviate from the ordinance.
John Jennings, acting BBI chief, said the bureau does not enforce the ordinance unless it receives a complaint. Residents first receive a warning. After that they face fines that district judges determine. Fines can run as much as $1,000, Jennings said.
“We're getting complaints from people around there who don't want people parking on the pads,” he said. “We're kind of the bad guys in the middle here.”
The Squirrel Hill Urban Coalition, a nonprofit neighborhood civic group, opposes makeshift parking pads. Coalition board member Steven Hawkins said residents have created gravel lots in front yards and dug out entire front yards for pads on which to park commercial vehicles.
“That is not the neighborhood we want,” he said.
O'Connor and Kail-Smith said they will work to enact changes that would give relief to the Freedmans and others in their predicament. They hope to have all recently issued citations invalidated.
“People should be allowed to park in their own driveway,” Kail-Smith said.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pirates win bidding for Korean infielder
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin won’t ask for taunting clarification from league
- Pitt recruit Whitehead remains committed
- Worker at Mercer County center accused of illegal sexual contact with juveniles
- Ex-Penguins defenseman Niskanen still miffed by coaches’ firings
- Leon Ford’s civil rights lawsuit can proceed, judge rules
- Economy police release sketch of woman whose embalmed head was found in wooded area
- Rossi: Steelers rising fast in mediocre AFC
- Federal appeals court upholds ban on N.C. abortion law
- French van driver carries out 3rd attack in 3 days
- Stocks push to record highs, continuing rally