Share This Page

Edinboro considers cutting five majors, enhancing others as budget deficit looms

| Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013, 12:45 p.m.

Faced with a $5.5 million projected budget deficit and an 18 percent decline in enrollment since 2010, officials at Edinboro University of Pennsylvania are considering suspending five majors and as many as 40 faculty positions.

Edinboro President Julie Wollman announced the plan to faculty and staff on Tuesday afternoon at the school 100 miles north of Pittsburgh.

Wollman said declining enrollment, increasing fixed costs and declining state subsidies, coupled with a drop in the high school-age population, prompted officials to act.

The university, with an enrollment of approximately 7,300, is the second of the 14 schools in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education to propose job cuts to close budget deficits. Citing declining enrollments and stagnant state support, officials at Clarion University of Pennsylvania last month announced a plan to cut programs and staff to pare an $8 million deficit. And Slippery Rock University President Cheryl Norton is scheduled to address a projected $5.2 million budget deficit on Thursday.

Edinboro, Clarion and Slippery Rock are among 12 universities in the state system that reported declining enrollment based on preliminary figures released last week. Edinboro's preliminary numbers showed a decline of 3.4 percent this year.

Wollman said Edinboro's plan would eliminate 13 non-faculty staff and management positions this fiscal year. As many as to 40 full-time equivalent faculty positions could be cut by 2014-15.

University spokesman Jeff Hileman said Edinboro's union contract calls for a year's notice before full-time permanent faculty positions can be cut. He added that about half of the positions to be cut are held by temporary faculty, some of whom may be let go as early as the 2014 spring semester.

Edinboro faculty union president Jean Jones said she was shocked that the administration released the plan publicly prior to discussing it with faculty representatives.

“Unfortunately, management has spent years putting more money into capital projects and debt service at the expense of student instruction. Instead of overspending on capital projects, the university should have been preparing to deal with lower enrollments and fewer students on campus,” Jones said.

Hileman, however, said faculty members were part of discussions beginning in July.

Hileman said fewer than 100 students are pursuing the majors that would be suspended, which included bachelor of arts programs in German, music, music education, philosophy and world languages and cultures.

“The demand for those programs is such that it no longer is viable for us to continue them as majors,” Hileman said.

Courses in those subjects will continue to be offered as part of Edinboro's general education curriculum, and students enrolled in those degree programs will be permitted to finish them.

Meanwhile, the plan calls for adding or enhancing programs in animation and digital arts, forensic computing, industrial psychology, integrated media production, intercultural and international studies, leadership and water resource management. The plan includes adding graduate programs in animation arts, business and criminal justice.

“We're finding the emphasis on return on their education is inspiring students to look toward areas where they think they can get a good job, make a living and make their education pay off,'” Hileman said.

Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or derdley@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.