Transgender man claims discrimination, says Pitt denied his use of male restrooms, locker rooms
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Sept. 16, 2013, 2:42 p.m.
A Cambria County transgender man claims in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that University of Pittsburgh officials and police at the Johnstown campus violated his rights during a dispute over his use of male locker rooms and restrooms.
Seamus Johnston, 24, pleaded guilty on May 30 to summary offenses of trespassing and disorderly conduct in connection with the dispute and a Cambria County judge sentenced him to 90 days probation, according to court records.
Johnston, representing himself, claims in the lawsuit that barring him from the male facilities violated state and federal anti-discrimination laws.
He also claims the university retaliated by providing his name to the FBI during its investigation of a series of bomb threats in the spring of 2012. The FBI questioned Johnston last year but didn't charge him.
University spokesman Ken Service said Pitt will “vigorously defend” itself against Johnston's claims.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
- Q&A with NHL commissioner Gary Bettman
- Reward offered in six-year-old homicide in Clairton
- Obama, House Republicans trade accusations in thwarting immigration reform
- Legal experts question prosecuting South Fayette boy for recording bullies
- Peduto says Penguins playoff series will be economic boon
- Elementary school program in Plum shows fun and math can be in same equation
- Legislative sting’s scope broad, diverse
- Former heavyweight champ Tyson enjoying second act
- Chartiers Valley softball team hopes strong start leads to different results
- Jailed Hribal ‘fine,’ but family ‘terrible’ as answers in stabbing sought