Mom says Clairton schools failed to transport her son
After her son broke out a bus window during a bullying incident, Clairton City School District failed to provide him with transportation that would have kept him in school, the mother of a 9-year-old former student claims in a federal lawsuit filed Tuesday.
The mother, identified only as L.F., claims the district failed to accommodate her son's disabilities, which include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, a mood disorder and an impulse control disorder. When her son was being transported in a van with an aide, he did fine, but when the district put him on a regular school buss with bullies, things got out of hand, the lawsuit says.
The bus company refused to let her son back on the bus and the district failed to come up with any alternative, the lawsuit says. Her son is now in a residential treatment facility, the lawsuit says.
Charles Steele, the mother's lawyer, couldn't be reached for comment. John Rushford, the attorney representing the district, declined comment.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.