Judge dismisses Allderdice graduate's federal lawsuit against district
Published: Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 12:48 p.m.
Pittsburgh Public Schools might have done more for a former Allderdice High School student who struggled to graduate after a chronic medical condition left her homebound for months at a time, but it didn't violate her rights, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.
The former student, now 21, sued the district in November, challenging a state hearing officers August 2012 ruling in favor of the district. The lawsuit claims the district's individual plan to provide her with an education had several shortcomings.
U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab said in dismissing the case that the student, identified as K.K. in the lawsuit, had at most “demonstrated an imperfect plan imperfectly implemented,” but hadn't shown that school and district officials were indifferent to her plight.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Health-insurance mandate poses potential hitch for volunteer fire companies
- Penguins center Sutter is thriving despite unsettled 3rd line
- Century III new owner seeks to reverse vacancy trend with new theater
- New Armstrong bowling programs come up short against Butler in home debut
- Leader Times roundup: Apollo-Ridge boys improve to 4-0
- Philadelphia senator’s bill restricts anti-abortion protesters
- Kittanning’s defense shuts down rival Ford City
- Motivated quarterback Roethlisberger fights to prop up Steelers
- Kovacevic: Why give credence to Heisman?
- Pitt’s Donald wins Lombardi Award
- Baldwin-Whitehall School Board eliminates controversial administrative position