Arrest warrant issued for Plum attorney who failed to appear
A Plum attorney scheduled to be sentenced on Wednesday for running a $1.7 million mortgage fraud scheme checked herself into a hospital instead of going to federal court. Her next stop will apparently be the Allegheny County Jail.
U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon issued an arrest warrant for Lisa Gerideau-Williams, 47, because she failed to appear in court. Assistant U.S. Attorney Brendan Conway requested the warrant.
Warner Mariani, Gerideau-Williams' attorney, said his client emailed him on Wednesday morning that she was going to the hospital without any further explanation.
“I didn't know anything about it,” he said.
Gerideau-Williams pleaded guilty in January to 16 counts of wire fraud, filing false income tax returns and failing to file income tax returns. She operated Genesis Home Solution, a mortgage broker business, and two companies that specialized in closing real estate transactions, prosecutors say.
Using these companies, she submitted loan applications to lenders without the authority of the people whose names she was using to borrow money. She used the applications to lie about the borrowers' financial condition, prosecutors say.
She also diverted money from her clients to her personal use and billed borrowers for services she did not provide, prosecutors said.
Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.