Share This Page

New Castle man charged with videotaping girls at store, owning child porn

| Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 3:57 p.m.

Police charged a Lawrence County man with distributing child pornography and secretly videotaping underage girls at Wal-Mart, the state Attorney General's office said.

Undercover investigators tracking the use of online file-sharing programs said Scott Nicolls, 43, of New Castle, downloaded at least three videos between July 29 and Aug. 9, depicting young girls in sexual situations, according to court documents.

A search of Nicolls' home computers uncovered at least 10 videos containing child pornography, authorities said.

Computers seized from Nicolls' house also contained home videos that he allegedly made at a Wal-Mart by hiding a camera in a shopping cart and following underage girls through the store into the parking lot or while they were standing in line with parents and friends as he focused the camera on their buttocks.

Nicolls was arrested Friday and charged with seven counts of possession of child pornography, three counts of distribution of child pornography and one count of criminal use of a communication facility. He remains in the Lawrence County Jail in lieu of a $75,000 bond.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.