Coverup theories on JFK assassination explored at Duquesne University
Five decades have done nothing to blunt the debate over who pulled the trigger — or triggers — in Dealey Plaza.
A month before the 50th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy's assassination, about 450 academics, students and history buffs gathered in Pittsburgh on Thursday to start three days of discussion on what they say is wrong with the government's official explanation.
Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, whose namesake institute at Duquesne University is hosting the “Passing the Torch” symposium, said he still expects the government to “throw in the towel” and admit the Warren Commission and other official investigations covered up a conspiracy.
“Those here under 40 will see that day,” said Wecht, a forensic pathologist and former Allegheny County coroner who was among the first to openly question the commission's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. “I used to think it would be in my lifetime.”
He and others cited recent polls showing that up to 85 percent of people think Oswald was not the lone gunman.
Dr. Robert N. McClelland, in a videoconference feed from Texas, described a scene at Parkland Hospital that conflicts with the government account.
As a senior attending physician, McClelland treated Kennedy and described seeing a large exit wound from the back of the president's head. He said he later saw an autopsy photo in which Kennedy's head appeared to be patched up.
“I was 18 inches above the back of the president's head,” he said. “I paid a lot of attention to that.”
Attendees heard and saw photographic and acoustic evidence, both enhanced by new technology, that presenters say buttresses their case that multiple shooters fired on Kennedy from several angles.
“A half century later, independent researchers are coming up with new proof,” said Robert J. Groden. In 1975, he was the first person to publicly air the Zapruder film of the assassination and, like Wecht, he worked with the House Select Committee on Assassinations.
He was one of many who sneered at the single-bullet theory that the late Sen. Arlen Specter put forth as a lawyer for the Warren Commission.
Across the state, a Single Bullet Exhibition opening Monday had a special preview at the Arlen Specter Center for Public Policy at Philadelphia University.
In Pittsburgh, director Oliver Stone, whose film “JFK” introduced alternate theories of the case to a new generation, joined a panel discussion on how media covered the investigation, and he planned to speak again on Friday.
Also planned for the conference's final two days were presentations on the prosecution of Clay Shaw, an analysis of Air Force One tapes recorded after the killing and a discussion of then-CIA Director Allen Dulles.
For information, visit www.duq.edu/jfk.
David Conti is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5802 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Elizabeth Forward team honored for playoff berth
- Board vote turns in favor of union workers
- White Oak church keeps alive Scots community celebration
- Harvest of Hope fundraiser to support cancer patients
- Red Wings rally, shock Penguins in overtime
- Predators winger Neal caught ‘blindsided’ by trade from Penguins
- Rossi: Middling Steelers must make a statement
- Report linking field surface to cancer elicits Mt. Lebanon protest
- Falling fuel prices help airlines — not fliers
- The real Captain Phillips brings story of piracy to St. Vincent College
- Former Ligonier Township supervisor accused of costing residents thousands, viewing porn on the job