Lawmaker seeks supporters for effort to impeach Attorney General Kane
State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Cranberry, is seeking co-sponsors for legislation to impeach Attorney General Kathleen Kane, a Democrat, for refusing to defend the state's ban on gay marriage.
He said she has a duty to defend the constitutionality of state statutes.
“It is our duty to stop her from further misbehavior in office,” Metcalfe told colleagues in a memo.
Kane responded with a blistering statement Tuesday accusing Metcalfe of bullying and “political gamesmanship.”
“The citizens of this great commonwealth should be revolted that a politician such as Rep. Metcalfe is attempting to thwart an independent attorney general from doing her job by using such a measure,” Kane said. “I have never been afraid of or backed down from bullies. In fact, bullies strengthen my resolve to protect those who need it the most — the people of Pennsylvania.”
Metcalfe said Kane's full statement sounded like a campaign speech. He denied playing politics, saying Kane can't act like a “sitting judge while serving as attorney general.” She can't “pick and choose her cases,” he said.
Kane in August said she could not defend the constitutionality of the state's marriage act, which defines marriage as between “one man and one woman.” She referred the case to Republican Gov. Tom Corbett's general counsel as she said she is allowed to do.
House Speaker Sam Smith, a Punxsutawney Republican, said Metcalfe's proposal would be given “serious consideration,” his spokesman Stephen Miskin said.
Brad Bumsted is state Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 and email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- CDC’s misinformation spreads faster than Ebola virus
- Pirates must weigh risk, reward in attempt to sign Martin
- Syrian border town emerges as pivot point in Islamic State fight
- Starkey: Chryst missed his only shot
- Penguins’ Crosby OK with Neal comments about trade
- Pittsburgh Mills mall stability questioned
- Penguins rebound with shutout of Predators
- Penn State succumbs to No. 13 Ohio State in double overtime
- Steelers notebook: Ex-Steeler Sanders living up to his word
- Pa. Supreme Court in ‘sad state’ as scandals tarnish reputation
- Inappropriate dress wears thin in schools, courts, jails, elsewhere