Electrical fire shuts down reactor at Beaver County nuclear power plant
There was no danger to the public during “a small fire” late Tuesday afternoon at the nuclear power plant on the banks of the Ohio River in Beaver County, company officials said.
Operators of the Beaver Valley Power Station in Shippingport shut down the Unit 1 reactor because of an electrical fault that started shortly before 6 p.m. outside the turbine where electricity is produced, said Jennifer Young, a spokeswoman for FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co., which owns the plant.
“There was no danger to public health and safety,” Young said. “The fire was not in the reactor or the reactor building. The plant is now stable, and we are in the assessment stage. There were no injuries.”
Operators noticed indications of a problem in a breaker, and, when they inspected, they saw an electrical short and a small fire, Young said. The fire was quickly extinguished, she said.
Although emergency officials were notified and firefighters were summoned, they were not needed and didn't enter the plant, Young and Beaver County emergency dispatchers said.
There was no immediate word on the extent of damage or how long the unit would be shut down, Young said. She said customer service would not be affected.
Unit 1 was shut down on Sept. 30 for scheduled refueling and maintenance and had just started producing enough power to be considered “online” again Monday night, Young said.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.