Judge agrees to delay modifying Orie Melvin's sentence — for now
An Allegheny County judge on Thursday said he would consider an argument that he doesn't have the authority to change former state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin's sentence because it is being appealed to a higher court.
“This court does not have jurisdiction to do anything with the sentence,” Orie Melvin's attorney Patrick Casey told Common Pleas Judge Lester G. Nauhaus.
Nauhaus disagreed, but said he would consider Casey's argument and reconvene Orie Melvin's sentence modification hearing Friday morning.
After a jury convicted Melvin of illegally using her public office and staff to campaign for the court, Nauhaus sentenced her to three years of house arrest and two years of probation.
He ordered her to work at a soup kitchen three days a week and write apology letters to state judges on the front of a picture of her in handcuffs.
A panel of Superior Court judges this month ruled Melvin, 57, of Marshall does not have to write the apology letter.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.