TribLIVE

| News


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

AG argues against court hearing Sandusky appeal

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013, 1:21 p.m.
 

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania prosecutors say there's no reason the state Supreme Court should take up Jerry Sandusky's molestation conviction on appeal.

State court officials on Thursday posted a filing by the Pennsylvania attorney general's office that said the former Penn State assistant football coach hasn't put forward “special and important reasons” the justices should consider the appeal.

Sandusky argues his lawyers were rushed to trial and prosecutors improperly referred to his decision not to testify.

He also says the trial judge should have issued a jury instruction on the delay in reporting by his victims and that the judge erred by telling jurors to weigh evidence of his good character against all other evidence in the case.

Sandusky's lawyer says his earlier filing laid out why the appeal ought to be heard.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Steelers notebook: Tomlin won’t discuss discipline for Bell, Blount
  2. Pirates add six players to roster, including OF Polanco
  3. Pittsburgh mayor says new police chief’s skills fit the job well
  4. WVU notebook: Holgorsen expects similar effort
  5. United Kingdom at risk, new poll finds
  6. Unlike years past, strength of 2014 Steelers could be offense
  7. Former Dormont businessman avoids jail for wire fraud
  8. Steelers Lookahead: Previewing Sunday’s game vs. Cleveland
  9. Retail theft suspect takes off, leaves baby at Rostraver Township Walmart
  10. Regulators release details of Highmark’s post-UPMC transition plan
  11. Steelers notebook: Polamalu made 1st-time captain; Roethlisberger named for offense
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.