Jury begins deliberations in Hopkins homicide trial
Jurors will resume deliberations Friday in the case of a former Bridgewater councilman accused of strangling a Monaca woman 34 years ago.
The jury of seven women and five men began deliberations at about 1 p.m. Thursday and returned to the courtroom about 3:30 p.m. to ask to examine a piece of evidence. Beaver County Judge Harry Knafelc sent them home for the night shortly before 5:30 p.m.
In closing arguments, a lawyer defending Gregory Scott Hopkins, 67, challenged the jury to acquit his client because of a lack of evidence connecting him to the murder of Catherine Janet Walsh on Sept. 1, 1979.
Beaver County prosecutor Frank Martocci told the jury that “the evidence shows he (Hopkins) did it.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.