Former student with autism sues Pine-Richland for keeping him off senior varsity hockey team
A former student claims in a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday that Pine-Richland School District and its hockey association kept him off the senior varsity team because of his autism.
The 18-year-old former student, identified only as J.G., says in the lawsuit that he played hockey for several years without incident and was the leading goal scorer of the junior varsity team. In October 2012, he told his parents that he was having increasing problems communicating with the coach and was being harassed by other players during practices, the lawsuit says.
Despite several meetings with the district and the association's coaching staff, the problems became worse and J.G. wasn't picked for the senior varsity team even though it had four vacancies after the other players were chosen, the lawsuit says. His lawyer and the district's solicitor couldn't be reached for comment.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.