Share This Page

Schmotzer resigns high-paid administrative job with Baldwin-Whitehall

| Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013, 2:36 p.m.
Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Baldwin-Whitehall board member Martin Schmotzer, seated left, listens to proceedings during a board meeting Wednesday, Deember 4, 2013 at the Baldwin-Whitehall School District office.
Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Baldwin-Whitehall board member Martin Schmotzer, seated left, listens to proceedings in a board meeting Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013 at the Baldwin-Whitehall School District office.
Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Baldwin-Whitehall board member Martin Schmotzer, center, takes a seat amongst jests from the crowd assembled Wednesday, December 4, 2013 for a board meeting at the Baldwin-Whitehall School District office. At left is board member Elliot Rambo.
Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Baldwin-Whitehall board member Martin Schmotzer, left, gets sworn in by District Judge Richard King, as Martin's daughter Victoria, 17, stands by Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013 at the Baldwin-Whitehall School District office.
Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Baldwin-Whitehall board member Martin Schmotzer listens to proceedings during a board meeting Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013 at the school district office.
Martin Schmotzer

Amid raucous chants of “ho, ho, ho, Marty's got to go,” Martin Michael Schmotzer was sworn in to a four-year term on the Baldwin-Whitehall School Board on Wednesday night, hours after he resigned from a controversial board-appointed administrative post.

“The political and personal attacks on me and my family are not worth continuing in this endeavor,” Schmotzer explained in a statement.

The public outcry over his Nov. 19 appointment prompted as many as 250 residents to attend the reorganization session, forcing the meeting to be moved from the board's meeting chambers to the Whitehall Elementary School gymnasium.

“I'm happy that everybody is showing up,” said Whitehall resident Lou Rainaldi, 43, who started a petition seeking Schmotzer's ouster from his $120,000-a-year, five-year job as supervisor of special projects for the board of school directors and special assistant to the superintendent.

Rainaldi presented the petition with more than 1,200 signatures, which also sought for board members to be elected instead of appointed when vacancies arise, to board members.

“We need to still be here. We need to keep this going,” Rainaldi said.

Having Schmotzer resign from the position is just the first step, Rainaldi said. Next, if board members decide to keep the administrative position, it needs to be advertised and filled in an appropriate manner, he said.

“The board, as far as I'm concerned, has lost all integrity,” Rainaldi said. “I believe everybody on the board, except Tracy Macek, needs to be replaced.”

Superintendent Randal Lutz said he did not know whether the administrative position will remain.

Newly elected board members Karen Brown, David Solenday and Elliot Rambo were sworn in, along with Schmotzer.

“He resigned,” residents shouted as they learned that Schmotzer was being sworn in to a new term.

Schmotzer, 57, of Whitehall did not submit a resumé, nor was he interviewed for the assistant to the superintendent position that was established moments before his hiring, sparking outrage among community members.

Macek cast the only dissenting vote.

“After many heartfelt discussions with my family, friends and constituents, I have decided that it is in the best interest of the Baldwin-Whitehall School District for me to resign my position,” Schmotzer said in a statement.

Schmotzer's daughter stood by his side as he was sworn into office.

Near the end of the meeting, Schmotzer attempted to speak during the board comments. Residents shouted over him, calling on him to resign, then began leaving the meeting.

The public school code says a school board member cannot be employed by a district “during the term for which he was elected or appointed,” state Department of Education officials have said.

Baldwin-Whitehall solicitor Bruce Dice said Wednesday that he maintains Schmotzer's appointment was legal.

“This matter is moot at this point. He's resigned at this point,” Dice said. “My position is that it's no longer a matter to discuss.”

Baldwin Borough resident Marion Shannon filed a complaint in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court last week against Schmotzer and the district stating the appointment violated the state Public School Code and asking the court to ban him from working in the district until his term would have ended in December. It also said the board violated the Sunshine Act by holding prearranged meetings to discuss Schmotzer's appointment and salary.

Dice said that he does not believe a resident has the right to file such a claim against the district.

Shannon could not be reached for comment.

Schmotzer, who was appointed to the school board in December 2012 to fill a seat vacated by his brother, John, was elected on Nov. 5 to a four-year term.

In 1996, Schmotzer was charged with the theft of $50,000 from public accounts in the Allegheny County Clerk of Courts office while working as chief deputy for then-clerk Joyce Lee Itkin. He repaid the money. A judge tossed out one theft charge when Schmotzer pleaded guilty. Court delays prompted a state appellate court to dismiss his convictions on four other theft counts. Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Manning ordered his record expunged in 2006.

Stephanie Hacke and Melissa Daniels are staff writers for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.