Hospital says state inspection shows former employee's lawsuit baseless
A Greene County hospital administrator says a state Health Department investigation determined the facility followed state regulations in the referral of a pregnant woman, which is the basis for a federal lawsuit by a former employee.
“The (health department) report, which completely exonerated the Medical Center of any non-compliance issues, paves the way for us to move forward with continuing to provide quality health care for our community,” said Dr. Jami Diamond Boris, chief medical officer of Southwest Regional Medical Center.
Marie Gillispie, 49, of Center claims in the lawsuit that the hospital fired her on Nov. 1, 2012, days after she insisted management report the staff's failure to follow federal law in referring a pregnant woman to Uniontown Hospital. Boris said the state agency report shows that Gillispie's claims are groundless.
Her attorney, Noah Geary, and a health department spokesman couldn't be reached for comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reagan shooter Hinckley closer to permanent freedom
- Steelers won’t be backed into a corner at NFL Draft
- Transportation funding uncertainty impacts planning for Western Pa.
- Crosby’s 2 goals lift Penguins past Rangers, even series
- Starkey: Taylor’s type fading away
- Boscov’s could help sustain decade-old Pittsburgh Mills
- Man beaten, robbed in South Side, police say
- Fights reported, shots fired outside Monroeville Mall restaurant
- Coming off hill revives Seton Hill University, downtown Greensburg
- New York City rent increases oust small retailers
- Use of multiple contractors could leave oil, gas operators open to hackers