Pittsburgh police commander sues police officials, city for alleged harassment
Pittsburgh Zone 3 police Cmdr. Catherine McNeilly claims in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that top police officials are harassing her because of a 2006 lawsuit in which she successfully challenged her demotion to lieutenant.
The most recent retaliation was a written reprimand by Assistant Chief Maurita Bryant who cited McNeilly for allowing the officers under her command to engage in unprofessional conduct, the lawsuit says.
McNeilly claims the command mishandled a complaint by a black female officer who reported a racist comment by a white male officer. When McNeilly pressed the issue, Bryant also cited her for insubordination, the lawsuit says.
McNeilly is suing the city, Bryant, Mayor Luke Ravenstahl, former Chief Nate Harper, acting Chief Regina McDonald and Deputy Chief Paul Donaldson.
The city also violated the settlement in the 2006 lawsuit when it promoted George Trosky to assistant chief in August 2012 without interviewing her for the position, the lawsuit says.
City solicitor Dan Regan declined comment.
Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Total Trib Media. Contact him at 412-325-4301 at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.