New NFL royalty battle kicks off in Pittsburgh federal court
The final settlement of an National Football League royalty case in Minnesota federal court has kicked of a new lawsuit by more than 630 retired professional football players in Pittsburgh federal court.
The players filed a similar lawsuit in August, but the federal judge overseeing the national settlement ordered it and similar lawsuits dropped until the agreement was made final.
Jason Luckasevic said that Monday was the first day the players who opted out of the settlement could file their own lawsuits.
“Since these guys have retired the NFL has continued to profit off the use of their images,” but the players haven't shared in those profits, he said.
The lawsuit seeks damages for those unpaid royalties. An NFL spokesman couldn't be reached for comment.
The players Luckasevic represents opted out of a $42 million settlement between the NFL and other retired players. That agreement doesn't pay the retirees directly. It formed the Common Good Fund, which will distribute the settlement money to groups that help retired players with medical, housing and career transition costs.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Rossi: Brawl for ADs between Pitt and WVU
- Icy roads, cold causing school delays, wrecks in Western Pa.
- Police gather in Ligonier for Perryopolis officer’s funeral
- Steelers must be creative in providing snaps for linebackers
- Analysis: Misunderstood Chryst served Pitt well
- Fleury’s career-best 6th shutout lifts Penguins over Avalanche in overtime
- Time is of essence for Pitt in finding football coach, athletic director
- Pitt offensive coordinator Rudolph still focused on Panthers
- Veteran tight end Miller’s blocking skill crucial to success to Steelers running game
- Family escapes house fire in Kittanning
- Steelers notebook: Chiefs pass rush to test Steelers