Share This Page

Police seeking man who threatened Washington County Wal-Mart

| Tuesday, Dec. 24, 2013, 1:57 p.m.

Washington County authorities are searching for a Houston man they suspect made calls on Christmas Eve in which he threatened to shoot and blow up a Wal-Mart in South Strabane, reportedly because he was angry about the store's return policy.

Charles Martin, 24, is wanted on unrelated charges by the Washington County Adult Probation Office, and charges from Tuesday's incident likely will be filed soon, said John Bruner, a South Strabane police officer.

Police said a man called Wal-Mart's customer service department about 8 a.m. and said he was upset with a transaction.

“He made some threats that he was going to shoot the place up and made reference to using explosives,” Bruner said. “In today's age, with there having been a rise in mass-shooter instances, we must take this very seriously.”

Nine law enforcement agencies responded to the incident.

“We flooded and secured the area,” Bruner said.

Anyone with information on Martin's whereabouts is asked to call 911, Bruner said.

“We suspect he's the individual who made the threats,” Bruner said. “We were able to get some information and connect the dots.”

Police believe the threat was quelled but want to locate Martin to be sure.

The store at the Trinity Point shopping center remained open after the incident.

Jason Cato is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-320-7936 or jcato@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.