Former PPG executive arraigned on second-degree murder charges
LEBANON, N.H. — A former Fortune 500 executive who worked at PPG Industries was arraigned on Friday on second-degree murder charges in a crash that killed a Vermont couple expecting their first child in January.
Robert Dellinger, 53, of Sunapee, N.H., told police that he was depressed and was trying to kill himself on Dec. 7 when he drove his pickup across an Interstate 89 median and into an oncoming car.
Police say the truck became airborne and sheared off the top of the couple's car, killing them instantly. Their unborn child did not survive.
He was arraigned on two counts of second-degree murder in the deaths of Jason Timmons, 29, and Amanda Murphy, 24, who was eight months pregnant.
Dellinger suffered cuts on his head and face and at first was charged with two counts of reckless manslaughter.
According to prosecutors, Dellinger told troopers that he had argued with his wife over medication he was taking for depression and was driving around when he decided to commit suicide.
“Everybody's trying very hard to hold up,” said his lawyer, Peter Decato. “As you might imagine, it's very difficult for everybody. You see families agonizing over their lost loved ones and a family agonizing over the loss of liberty of their loved one.”
Dellinger is being held without bail until a probable-cause hearing on Jan. 14, after which a bail hearing can be scheduled.
A conviction on second-degree murder carries a sentence of up to life in prison.
Dellinger's résumé as a top financial executive for corporate giants took him to locations from Schenectady, N.Y., to Singapore. His last two jobs were in Western Pennsylvania, including a two-year stint as chief financial officer for PPG Industries. He left in 2011 because of health issues.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.