Swissvale teen charged in drive-by shooting
By Bill Vidonic
Published: Saturday, Dec. 28, 2013, 9:57 a.m.
Allegheny County police charged a Swissvale teen with attempted homicide, aggravated assault and related offenses in a drive-by shooting on Friday.
According to a criminal complaint, the teen, who is 15, was one of several people in a vehicle that approached some men walking in the 2300 block of Woodstock Avenue about 2:30 p.m. Friday.
One man said he saw the teenager holding a semi-automatic pistol as he was sitting in the front passenger seat. The driver held a black revolver.
The men began to run and heard gunshots, according to the complaint.
Teenager then fired into a garage where one man had ducked inside, police wrote.
Another man said he felt fragments from the bullets hit his face.
Police spotted the vehicle on the Rankin Bridge, and that started a short chase that ended near Highwood Street in Munhall.
Police wrote that five men jumped out of the vehicle and fled, and police were able to find three of them, including the teenager. While in custody, according to the complaint, the teen told his companions that he fired the shots.
His bond information wasn't available.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Three ejected after Pirates, Brewers brawl
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding
- Egg decorating turns to fight, charges in Brookline, police say
- Cool chemistry: Programs at Springdale library take inspiration from late science professor
- Choral concerts planned in Dawson church
- Plum man revels in Keystone hall of fame induction
- Six NA students finalists in Musical Kids competition
- Bridge work planned for Route 68 in Brady’s Bend
- Study to target pool use at Belmont Complex
- Matt Calvert’s goal in double OT evens series for Blue Jackets