TribLIVE

| News

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

UPMC contends it is not subject to affirmative action audits

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Tuesday, Dec. 31, 2013, 1:21 p.m.
 

A trio of civil rights groups and a labor union on Monday filed briefs in a Washington federal appeals court, joining a government battle to regulate UPMC as a federal contractor subject to affirmative action compliance audits.

The National Women's Law Center, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the National Partnership for Women & Families joined in one brief, while SEIU Healthcare Pennsylvania filed a second one. Both filings contend that UPMC's arguments aim to scuttle affirmative action protections that have governed federal contractors for decades.

UPMC provided service to federal employees at its UPMC Braddock, McKeesport and South Side hospitals between 2003 and 2006 under the UPMC Health Plan.

But the health care giant has insisted it is not a federal contractor or subcontractor and has fought government efforts to regulate it as such since 2004.

“UPMC entities that are federal contractors or subcontractors fully comply with (Office of Federal Compliance Program) requirements,” said UPMC spokeswoman Gloria Kreps.

“These filings by the SEIU and other special interest groups blatantly misrepresent the issues in the Office of Federal Compliance Programs matter as well as UPMC's position in that litigation,” Kreps said.

The distinction is the focus of a long-running legal battle in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, where UPMC is appealing a federal ruling from March that found that it was subject to the regulations and compliance audits.

“Also at issue is whether certain Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program regulations would impermissibly require UPMC to make employment decisions based on race or gender. UPMC has asserted that they would; OFCCP has argued that they would not,” Kreps said.

Kreps said UPMC “complies with and embraces all local, state and federal anti-discrimination requirements.”

UPMC and its supporters—including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Pennsylvania Hospital and Health System Association and several other groups that filed briefs in court — claim that allowing the government to audit UPMC as a federal subcontractor would establish a vast expansion of the federal government regulation and could increase health care costs at facilities across the nation.

Paula Bussard, senior vice president for policy and regulatory services for the Pennsylvania Hospital and Health System Association said hospitals already must adhere to state and federal civil rights act regulations.

Lawyers for the U.S. Department of Labor said UPMC received more than $3.5 million for services to federal employees between 2003 and 2006, and that UPMC “cannot reap the benefits of government contracting” while ignoring the conditions placed on the contracts.

Were the government to prevail in the UPMC case, it could add to the burden for hospitals and “doesn't really improve health care,” she said.

Fatima Goss Graves, a lawyer for the National Women's Law Center said the organization joined the legal battle after UPMC argued in its appeal that the 50-year-old Executive Order that established affirmative action regulations for federal contractors is not valid.

“They have made pretty sweeping challenges against decades of the law,” she said.

Neal Bison, President of SEIU Healthcare Pennsylvania, echoed her concerns.

“What UPMC is attempting to do is undo this, not just for themselves but for all federal contractors. It is really bullying behavior that would set back protections for women and people of color for decades,” Bisno said.

Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or derdley@tribweb.com.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Motorcyclist injured in Westmoreland flown to Pittsburgh
  2. Dude’s The Man captures Adios at The Meadows
  3. Rossi: Nothing huge, but Huntington helped Bucs
  4. Monongahela uses modern technology to connect people to the city’s historic past
  5. 2 killed in single-vehicle crash in Pittsburgh
  6. 2014 showing has Steelers RB Harris confident he belongs
  7. Pirates trade for Dodgers 1B/OF Morse, Mariners LHP Happ
  8. Marte’s 2 fine defensive plays rescue Pirates in victory over Reds
  9. Dek hockey summer camp ranks swell thanks to social media
  10. Steelers OLB coach Porter teaches as passionately as he played
  11. Steelers training camp has California University link