Pa. casinos suffer revenue hit despite table games
Casino revenue in Pennsylvania topped $3 billion in 2013, marking the third consecutive year the haul from table games and slot machines eclipsed that mark, the state Gaming Control Board reported on Thursday.
Total gambling revenue from the state's 12 casinos last year was $3.11 billion, down from the $3.16 billion in 2012. The state in 2013 received $1.38 billion in tax revenue from gambling.
Pennsylvania's casinos have generated $16.4 billion since the first slots-only casino opened in 2006.
Lawmakers approved table games in 2010.
State casinos in December generated $58.9 million, a 2.3 percent drop from December 2012, the agency reported.
December table game figures for Western Pennsylvania casinos are listed below. December 2012 figures are in parentheses.
• Rivers Casino, North Shore: $5.6 million ($5.8 million)
• Meadows Racetrack & Casino, South Strabane: $1.7 million ($3 million)
• Presque Isle Downs & Casino, Erie: $1.05 million ($1.09 million)
• Lady Luck Casino Nemacolin, Farmington: $350,000 (opened in 2013)
Table game revenue across the state was $730 million in 2013, a 6.2 percent increase compared with 2012. Total 2013 figures for Western Pennsylvania casinos are below with 2012 numbers in parentheses.
• Rivers Casino, North Shore: $67.7 million ($69.7 million)
• Meadows Racetrack & Casino, South Strabane: $34.6 million ($35.4 million)
• Presque Isle Downs & Casino, Erie: $13.5 million ($18.4 million)
• Lady Luck Casino Nemacolin, Farmington: $2.4 million (was not open)
Jason Cato is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7936 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.