Share This Page

Police accuse 3 men of faking Giant Eagle robbery in Cranberry

| Thursday, Jan. 23, 2014, 2:54 p.m.

A Giant Eagle employee and two others faked a robbery at the Cranberry store, township police said Thursday.

The cashier, along with two men, face charges of theft, conspiracy, receiving stolen property and making false reports. Police did not name any of the men and did not return messages seeking additional information.

The cashier reported that a man demanded cash from a register at the prepared foods counter around 2:45 p.m. Monday, and indicated he had a gun. The cashier gave police a description of the suspect, along with the vehicle he reportedly drove away in, police said. Police searched the area but didn't find the car or the suspect.

Video showed the suspect in the store and police released a photo. People called with names of potential suspects, and after police interviewed several people and the cashier, they discovered the robbery had been faked.

The cashier admitted that he and the other two men came up with a plan to take the money from the register and report it as a robbery, police said.

Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or bvidonic@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.