Tips from public lead police to Hempfield man who held woman at gunpoint
State police in Greensburg said tips from the public helped troopers on Thursday arrest a 42-year-old Hempfield man who allegedly abducted a woman and held her at gunpoint last week in New Stanton.
Dennis Lee Backus Jr. of Swede Hill Road was arrested at a home in Scottdale, said a state police spokesman, Trooper Steve Limani.
“Members of the Pennsylvania State Police Fugitive Apprehension Unit out of Pittsburgh took Dennis Lee Backus into custody. ... Backus was apprehended without incident,” Limani said.
Police said officers recovered a handgun from Backus' car.
Backus was ordered held in the county jail, having failed to post $50,000 bail after his arraignment before night duty District Judge Cheryl Peck-Yakopec.
Police had been looking for Backus since Jan. 16, when he is accused of going to the woman's home about 2 a.m. in violation of a protection from abuse order issued against him on Jan. 2 in Westmoreland County.
The victim said she was entering her house when she encountered Backus on the porch, according to an affidavit filed by Trooper Timothy Culler.
Police allege Backus forced the woman into his car by pointing a gun at her head and repeatedly threatened to kill her. Eventually, the woman persuaded Backus to put away the gun, and he placed it in the driver's-side door compartment. The woman told Backus she wanted to go home. He drove her to a nearby street and let her out of the car.
She then called police.
Backus' preliminary hearing is scheduled for Wednesday before District Judge Charles Moore.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.