Share This Page

Democratic candidate for governor pushes to legalize marijuana, says he never inhaled

| Saturday, Feb. 8, 2014, 5:57 p.m.

HERSHEY — John Hanger, the only candidate for governor pushing legalization of marijuana, says he never inhaled and, in fact, never put a joint near his mouth.

Hanger, a former Cabinet secretary of ex-Gov. Ed Rendell, has been pounding the pot issue at every opportunity, so the Tribune-Review posed the question to him in a hallway outside where the Democratic Party met Saturday to consider endorsements for governor.

“Never have. ... Completely sober,” Hanger said.

Other Democratic candidates say they support “decriminalization” in which there would be fines but no jail term for personal use.

The Democrats did not endorse a gubernatorial candidate.

Hanger, a former state environmental regulator and one-time member of the Public Utility Commission, said he enjoys “a little whiskey, a little wine.”

“It's an economic issue and a justice issue,” Hanger said of marijuana. Because he says he never used, he is “a good messenger.”

He would advise people not to smoke, but “I live in the real world.”

He would use marijuana, he said, if he were sick from cancer and the drug were legalized for medical use.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or bbumsted@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.