Proposed tax increase in Monroeville draws opposition
By Kyle Lawson
Published: Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2014, 9:24 p.m.
Monroeville property owners who attended a council meeting Tuesday night said they are opposed to another tax increase.
A proposed 2014 budget would increase the tax rate by 1.57 mills. The owner of a home assessed at $100,000 would pay $400 in real estate taxes, up $157 from 2013.
Resident Dan Alexander said a tax increase would be a burden on senior citizens.
“People who are on a fixed income... that extra tax is going to hurt them,” he said.
Council could finalize the budget in March.
The tax increase would generate $3.3 million, amid a growing debt service and a shortfall of commercial property tax revenue last year due to property reassessment appeals, interim municipal Manager Tim Little said.
Public hearings to discuss the budget are scheduled for Feb. 26 and March 6 at the Monroeville municipal building, 2700 Monroeville Blvd.
Last year, a half-mill increase resulted in a 2.431-mill tax rate.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Review: ‘Once’ charms as it breaks rules of musical theater
- Panthers free agent safety headed to Steelers
- Obama budget puts more money into nuclear cleanup, not locks and dams
- Fields set for primary elections on May 20
- Rural Ridge residents question NRG’s plans for landfill
- Forward supervisors OK park funding proposal
- Printing delinquent tax list pays off for Highlands
- Obamacare dramatically increases costs for some small businesses
- Chamber event targets small business, health care
- Orpik rises to occasion as Penguins take down Capitals once again
- Penguins notebook: Letang skating, but no return set