Ross business owner claims school district can't constitutionally collect business tax
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Feb. 18, 2014, 1:36 p.m.
The owner of a Ross business claims in a case moved to federal court Tuesday that the business privilege tax is somehow unconstitutional when applied to him.
The North Hills School District filed a criminal complaint in magistrate court claiming that Roman S. Tymiak, owner of North Hills Computer Associates, has refused to file a tax return. Tymiak filed a notice removing the case to federal court, claiming that the district's attempt to get him to file a return violates his constitutional rights.
He's also asking a federal judge to overturn his disbarment in the early 1980s by the Minnesota Supreme Court and the 1983 suspension of his law license by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Tymiak, who is representing himself, couldn't be reached for comment.
David Hall, business manager for the school district, said Tymiak could file an appeal with the district if he believes he's not subject to the tax. Hall, who is the hearing officer on appeals, said Tymiak so far hasn't filed such an appeal.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kovacevic: Still waiting on Malkin, Crosby
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Three ejected after Pirates, Brewers brawl
- Rossi: Lack of together time showing for Penguins’ defense
- Fleury a bright spot among struggling Penguins in playoffs
- Court upholds EPA emissions restrictions
- Pirates pitcher Cole’s strong outing wasted in 14-inning loss at home
- Attorney wants lesser term for woman in Greensburg torture death
- Population expansion in Western Pennsylvania hinges on immigrants
- Landslides put Baldwin firefighters in financial peril
- Egg decorating turns to fight, charges in Brookline, police say