Mon Wharf closed because of potential flooding
The Pittsburgh Parking Authority closed the Mon Wharf parking lot Downtown on Friday because of potential flooding from the combination of heavy rain overnight and warm temperatures forecast through the weekend that is hastening a late-February snow melt.
The decision temporarily to close the 458-space lot prompted the typical chorus of retorts on social media about its tendency, according to Pittsburgh lore anyway, to close at the first sign of flooding.
“I could dump a bucket outside my front steps in the South Hills and somehow the Mon Wharf would flood,” one post to Twitter said. Another Twitter user opined, “There should just be updates when the Mon Wharf is OPEN.”
Does the Mon Wharf close that often? And when?
Parking Authority records for 2013 and 2012 show the lot closed infrequently — less than two weeks out of the year if all the closings were combined — and that most of the closures occurred in the first three months of the year.
In 2012, the lot had five full closures and eight partial closures, mostly in January and March, records show.
In 2013, the lot fully closed 12 times — four times in January, seven times in February (Feb. 1-8) and once in December. A water main break on Fort Pitt Boulevard and Wood Street caused two of the 2013 closings in early January, records show.
The high temperature on Saturday is forecast to reach 55 degrees, but a chance of snow and a high of 39 degrees are predicted for Sunday. Parking Authority officials said they have not determined if the Mon Wharf will remain closed beyond Friday.
A National Weather Service flood advisory is in effect for the Ohio River until Sunday afternoon.
Jeremy Boren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7935 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.