Taxi drivers seek action against unlicensed ride services
By Bobby Kerlik
Published: Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2014, 8:27 p.m.
A group of 200 taxi drivers is suing the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission in an attempt to force the agency to crack down on unlicensed ride services and to allow licensed drivers to charge higher fees.
Cabbie Central filed the lawsuit Jan. 31 in Commonwealth Court. James Jacobs, who represents the organization, said he wants the PUC to cite jitneys and ride-sharing services like Lyft, because neither follow PUC regulations. He also wants the regulatory agency to allow for a fuel surcharge, which had been in effect but expired last year.
“The (fares) are so low it's difficult for drivers to survive,” Jacobs said. “We also want the city to pursue jitneys criminally.”
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto has said he would not support charging jitneys and supports Lyft, which began operating this month. The mayor wants the PUC to amend its rules to bring companies like Lyft into compliance.
Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers restructure Brown’s contract to become salary cap compliant
- Pirates seeks to tap Alvarez’s remaining upside
- Trade to Penguins caps frenetic period for winger Stempniak
- Pitt’s oldest known living football letterman turns 100
- Loss to Pitt propelled Clemson
- North Allegheny girls enjoy ‘bounce back’ win over WPIAL champion Penn-Trafford
- Connellsville boys tennis team has optimistic expectations
- Ukraine & history
- Hitler & Cold War II
- Hillary’s past is in play
- Keisel might be at end of Steelers career