More Pennsylvania voters say medical marijuana should be legal
Pennsylvania voters overwhelmingly support legalizing marijuana for medical use but remain split on whether personal use should be legal, a Quinnipiac University poll found.
Eighty-five percent of those polled support legalizing marijuana, compared with 14 percent who do not. Legalizing marijuana for personal use drew 48 percent in favor and 49 percent opposed.
The poll, released on Monday, showed 61 percent of voters would not be bothered by neighbors growing marijuana if it was legal.
Nearly half of those surveyed believe marijuana is as dangerous as alcohol, and 33 percent said it is less dangerous.
“Pennsylvanians think overwhelmingly that marijuana is equal to or less dangerous than alcohol, and join the American trend toward tolerance for both medical and recreational use,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
Quinnipiac polled 1,405 registered voters from Feb. 19 to 24. The poll has an error margin of 2.6 percentage points.
The poll found Pennsylvanians support allowing same-sex couples to marry, 57 percent to 37 percent, reflecting growing support for gay marriage.
Quinnipiac surveyed voters in January 2013 and found 47 percent favored allowing same-sex marriages and 43 percent opposed it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Retail theft suspect takes off, leaves baby at Rostraver Township Walmart
- Pittsburgh hires consultant, former Wisconsin police captain as chief
- Tomlin: Steelers preparing to face both Browns QBs
- Unlike years past, strength of 2014 Steelers could be offense
- Steelers Lookahead: Previewing Sunday’s game vs. Cleveland
- Bethel Park mortgage broker pleads guilty
- Wedding aboard Pittsburgh’s Gateway Clipper ends in arrests
- Parking Authority settles suit over kiosks
- Virginia GOP Senate candidate Gillespie piles up mileage pursuing Warner
- Pittsburgh police force’s diversity worsens since discrimination lawsuit
- Trial opens in case of man shot, paralyzed during traffic stop altercation