Share This Page

Former coach, University of Pittsburgh settle lawsuit

| Tuesday, March 4, 2014, 4:42 p.m.

Former Pitt football coach Michael Haywood apparently has settled his federal lawsuit against the university.

Lawyers for both sides on Tuesday filed a joint motion to dismiss the case.

The motion doesn't provide details of the agreement. Haywood's lawyer, Christopher Johns of Houston, Texas, couldn't be reached for comment.

University spokesman Ken Service declined comment.

Haywood, hired Dec. 15, 2012, claimed the university breached his contract and violated federal law when it fired him less than three weeks later following his arrest in South Bend, Ind., on domestic violence charges that subsequently were dismissed.

He was seeking $3.75 million in damages related to a clause in his five-year contract that required the university to pay him $750,000 a year if he was fired “without just cause.”

— Brian Bowling

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.