Stage volunteer dies following collapse at Pine-Richland High School
A stage volunteer died Monday night after collapsing on a scaffold at Pine-Richland High School during a musical rehearsal.
Bradley Oberg, 64, of Cranberry, died at 7:45 p.m. at UPMC Passavant hospital, where he was taken after collapsing about 45 minutes earlier, a spokesman for the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office said. An autopsy is scheduled Tuesday.
“During musical practice...one of the adult stage volunteers experienced a medical emergency and became non-responsive at approximately 7 p.m. in the Pine-Richland High School Auditorium,” according to a statement from Rachel A. Hathhorn, director of communications fror the school district.
“Members of the musical staff called 911, while others served as first responders, including a school certified nurse,” Hatthorn said.
Paramedics took Oberg to the hospital, she said. Northern Regional Police are investigating.
“Our thoughts go out to the volunteer and the volunteer's family. The district is initiating its emergency response plan and meeting with school counselors and psychologists,” Hathhorn said.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.