Share This Page

Most missing documents that resulted in Point Park University security alert found

| Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 5:42 p.m.

Point Park University officials say they have found missing documents that triggered alerts of a possible data breach last week.

University spokesman Lou Corsaro said Point Park's third-party shipper informed the university on Tuesday that it located a package of documents intended for delivery on or about Feb. 27 to the Downtown school.

“Those documents were mangled, and the shipper's security (staff) believes the package was caught in a conveyor belt. The documents that fell out when the packaging was caught were sent to a different facility, which is consistent with the standard practice for damaged packaging,” Corsaro said.

The original package, which included personal information destined for Point Park from its payroll processor, contained 1,400 to 1,500 pages of documents. Corsaro said all but 47 12 pages were located.

“Everyone believes it is highly unlikely the documents left the shipper's control,” Corsaro said.

University President Paul Hennigan notified 1,800 Point Park employees of a possible data breach last week and initiated an investigation.

“Employees will still be getting a letter regarding identity-monitoring services and other protective measures, and the university regrets any concern the matter has caused its employees. The call center for information regarding identity protection remains active,” Corsaro said.

Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.