State Supreme Court will hear appeal in case of 11-year-old murderer
The state Supreme Court will hear an appeal in the Jordan Brown murder case on Wednesday in Philadelphia.
Brown was 11 years old when arrested in 2009 in Lawrence County for fatally shooting his dad's pregnant fiancée, Kenzie Marie Houk. A juvenile judge ruled Brown delinquent, the equivalent of a guilty verdict, in 2012.
Brown's attorneys, Dennis Elisco and Stephen Colafella, seek a new trial. They argue that prosecutors did not sufficiently prove Brown was the murderer or that his gun was the murder weapon. The state Superior Court agreed and vacated the decision in May.
In briefs filed for the Supreme Court appeal, prosecutors from the Attorney General's Office contend that Brown was the only person in the house who could have killed Houk. They want the justices to affirm the juvenile judge's ruling.
A decision is not expected for a couple months, Colafella said.
Brown, 16, remains in a juvenile detention facility. The state cannot hold him past his 21st birthday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Clues to Chief Justice John Roberts’ thinking on new ObamaCare case
- For Steelers, a fight to finish for playoff berth
- Eagle Scout project gives Knoch High Stadium press box a face-lift
- Pirates enter Plan B with Martin off market
- Small retailers at intersection of social networks, foot traffic
- Allegheny County buck could prove to be state’s largest ever taken
- Islanders outwork Penguins to sweep back-to-back meetings
- Pitt beats Syracuse, snaps 3-game losing streak
- Starkey: No explaining Steelers, AFC North
- For Pitt men’s basketball team, trouble in paradise
- Shooting victims live with bullets to survive, thrive