Share This Page

Pittsburgh staying under state financial oversight

| Thursday, March 13, 2014, 12:48 p.m.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Mayor Bill Peduto listens to Gov. Tom Corbett at a news conference at the City-County Building in Downtown on Thursday, March, 13, 2014. Corbett permitted Pittsburgh to remain a financially distressed city under state Act 47.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Gov. Tom Corbett and Mayor Bill Peduto head to a news conference at the City-County Building in Downtown on Thursday, March, 13, 2014. Corbett permitted Pittsburgh to remain a financially distressed city under state Act 47.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Gov. Tom Corbett and Mayor Bill Peduto (left) hold a news conference at the City-County Building in Downtown on Thursday, March, 13, 2014. They were discussing Pittsburgh's status as a financially distressed city.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Gov. Tom Corbett (left) and Mayor Bill Peduto head to a news conference at the City-County Building in Downtown on Thursday, March 13, 2014. They were discussing the city and its status as a financially distressed city.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Gov. Tom Corbett listens to Mayor Bill Peduto at a news conference at the City-County Building in Downtown on Thursday, March, 13, 2014. They were discussing Pittsburgh's status as a financially distressed city.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Gov. Tom Corbett listens to Mayor Bill Peduto at a news conference at the City-County Building in Downtown on Thursday, March 13, 2014. They were discussing Pittsburgh's status as a financially distressed city.

Mayor Bill Peduto and Gov. Tom Corbett on Thursday called for five more years of state oversight of Pittsburgh's financial recovery, a decision that could test the city's ability to raise money and drew barbs from a major city union.

“I can appreciate the union leaders fighting for as much as they can get for their members. But I've got not 600 members, not 900 members. I have 310,000 members, and I gotta fight for them as hard,” Peduto said, referring to city residents.

For the past decade, Pittsburgh has operated as a financially distressed municipality under a financial oversight program governed by state Act 47. Two five-year recovery plans have allowed the city to reduce the size of its workforce, earn a higher bond rating and increase its pension fund reserves beyond 60 percent. But pension costs, long-term debt and neglected infrastructure needs continue to drag on city finances.

It's time, Peduto said, for a final five-year plan that provides long-term stability.

“We can hit these goals, and we can get the structure in there; it will sustain the city's budget no matter who the mayor is for years to come,” he said. “Once you hit the goals, you exit.”

The city's unions have urged the city to exit state oversight sooner.

Joe King, president of International Association of Firefighters Local No. 1, said Pittsburgh has used Act 47 “as a sword” to limit union gains. Act 47 means collective bargaining agreements in front of an arbitrator must consider the city's ability to pay in any decision, setting potential ceilings for benefits.

King said firefighters have given up $104 million through cuts in the department's operating budget since 2004 and in salary and benefit give-backs. The union recently urged Corbett in a letter to release the city from fiscal oversight.

“This is nothing but a politically motivated agreement between Peduto and Corbett,” said King, 64, of Brighton Heights. “Peduto is going to use this as a political sword to go to Harrisburg and try to realign firefighters' pensions and restrict collective bargaining, saying to the General Assembly, ‘This is what Act 47 told me to do.'”

Peduto disagreed that Act 47 hamstrings collective bargaining.

“It just says this is the amount of money the taxpayers of the city of Pittsburgh can afford to spend,” Peduto said.

Corbett of Shaler said the state wants Pittsburgh to come up with a five-year plan that works. Crafting the plan will involve input from state and local officials, the state Legislature-appointed Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority and Act 47 coordinators law firm Eckert Seamans and consultant Public Financial Management.

“While Pittsburgh continues to take considerable steps and efforts in stabilizing the city's financial position, many conditions that originally led to distressed determination have not been alleviated,” Corbett said.

Goals for the exit strategy include finding new revenue streams — perhaps in the form of payments from nonprofit organizations — spending more on capital improvements and increasing payments to pension funds. At the same time, Peduto said the city needs to decrease its debt and cut operational spending. Cost-cutting starts on Friday, he said, referring to more than 60 city employees who are retiring. Some of their positions will remain vacant, the mayor said.

“We've come a long way since 2003 with respect to our finances,” Controller Michael Lamb said. “And the issue now is these legacy costs and the opportunities for a new revenue stream for the city.”

Brian Jensen, executive director of the Pennsylvania Economic League of Greater Pittsburgh, said that while the city has plans to cover increased pension costs through parking taxes, more assistance must come by way of state laws.

That could involve reducing the cost of benefits for future employees, Jensen said, and forbidding pension spiking, or workers' inflating earnings before retirement to boost pension payments.

“They don't have the tools really to reduce the costs,” he said. “Basically, they're stuck until there are changes in state law.”

Peduto said he'll lobby the Legislature to pass “common-sense reforms” for Act 111 and Act 205, laws that govern collective bargaining and municipal pensions. But the legislative appetite for those reforms seems slight, with lawmakers focusing on enacting pension reform at the state employee level.

Melissa Daniels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Staff writer Bob Bauder contributed to this report.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.