Controller audit finds double payments to Allegheny County constables
Duplicate payments made to constables in Allegheny County highlighted a problem the county is trying to remedy, officials with the Controller's Office and district courts said.
An audit Controller Chelsa Wagner released on Tuesday determined that constables received $1,618.02 in double payments during an 18-month period, from the courts and the county. Auditors examined a fraction of the total payments constables requested.
“We have $1,600 that our audit revealed, but there is more money out there,” said Brad Korinski, chief legal counsel for the Controller's Office.
Yet Wagner said she did not think constables tried to bilk the system.
The audit is separate from an investigation into constables by the District Attorney's Office, said Mike Manko, a spokesman for District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. The office is investigating misuse of more than $30,000.
Wagner became concerned about the county's risk for fraud in paying constables because a Tarentum-based constable was charged with billing the county nearly $3,000 for invalid services in July, the audit said. The court case against Timothy Dzugan, 50, is pending.
During the months audited, courts paid 322 constables $2.9 million and the county paid 218 constables $4.7 million.
Constables are elected to six-year terms to execute warrants, serve subpoenas and transport defendants to and from court and jail. They can appoint deputy constables to help. About 300 constables work in the county, said Jim Miller, vice president of the Allegheny County Constables Association and a retired constable.
State law sets the fees constables can charge. Fees range from $13 for serving a subpoena to $38 for transporting an incarcerated prisoner. A typical warrant nets a constable $37.50 plus mileage, Miller said. The top-paid constable in the county made nearly $200,000 during the 18 months the controller's office audited, the audit found. Seventeen made more than $100,000.
Constables initially bill the court for services, which attempts to collect fees from defendants to pay the constables. If the court cannot collect the fees, constables are referred to the Controller's Office for payment.
Miller said constables might wait months for payment from the courts, and in that time, they may have received payment from the county.
“The system needs to be changed,” Miller said.
To address payment issues, district court clerks were told to attach notices to any bill they cannot pay before it heads to the county, said Claire C. Capristo, the district court administrator.
A year ago, the state Supreme Court issued rules for constables that included payment requirements. Two years ago, Allegheny County developed a handbook for constables that provided instructions for transporting juveniles and pregnant prisoners and prohibited strip searches and body-cavity searches.
Constables in the state came under scrutiny in 2008 after The Associated Press reported dozens of examples of misconduct, including constables caught stealing court money, having sex with prisoners, threatening people with weapons and illegally impersonating police.
Aaron Aupperlee is a Trib Total Media staff writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers wrap lackluster preseason with loss to Panthers
- Steelers notebook: Safety Mitchell faces former team, hurts leg
- Young adults drive home rental trend in Western Pennsylvania
- ‘Shocker’ tourney honors local pro wrestler’s memory
- East Allegheny officials confirm strike, notify parents
- DEP releases details of cases of drinking well contamination from drilling
- Preseason valuable for Steelers’ offensive line
- LaBar: Jake ‘The Snake’ Roberts reportedly hospitalized
- Government approves compromise on Corbett’s alternative Medicaid plan
- Pittsburgh Mayor Peduto won’t make Labor Day deadline to hire police chief
- New Ken-Arnold board asked to mediate between football groups