Scottish separatist charged in Pitt bomb threats remains overseas
A proclaimed Scottish separatist indicted for delivering online bomb threats against the University of Pittsburgh in the spring of 2012 has been released from an Irish prison but is not headed to the United States to answer charges any time soon, U.S. Attorney David Hickton announced on Tuesday.
A Pittsburgh federal grand jury in August 2012 indicted Adam Stuart Busby on charges that include international extortion, threatening a federal law enforcement officer and perpetrating hoaxes.
Busby was in prison on a European Union warrant on unrelated terrorist charges filed in Scotland. He is in a Dublin hostel on bail while awaiting a hearing before Ireland's Supreme Court on his appeal of his extradition to Scotland to answer the terror charges, Hickton said.
“We have taken all available legal action to extradite him to face charges in Western Pennsylvania after he faces pending charges in the (United Kingdom),” Hickton said.
Pitt received two sets of bomb threats in spring 2012 that forced frequent evacuations of campus buildings.
No one has been charged for the first set, which were written messages scrawled in campus bathrooms. Busby has been indicted for the second set, which were made by email.
Two men from Ohio were convicted and sentenced for emailing university officials extortion threats that claimed they would reveal the personal information of students and faculty unless the chancellor apologized for failing to protect students from the first two sets of threats.
Brian Bowling is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.