Slot machine revenues down at Rivers, Meadows and most other state casinos
The opening rounds of the Pittsburgh Poker Open poker tournament get underway at the Rivers Casino Thursday, Nov. 21, 2013.
Photo by Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Two Pittsburgh-area casinos were among nine statewide that posted year-over-year revenue declines from slot machines in March, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control board said Wednesday.
The board said total revenue from slot machines at Pennsylvania casinos was $216 million in March, down 5.7 percent from a year ago and the fifth consecutive monthly revenue decline from slots. Revenue this year from nine of the state's 11 casinos that were also open in March of 2013 slid 6.7 percent.
The harsh winter weather that continued into March is believed to have played a role in the decline.
Rivers Casino in Pittsburgh's North Side took in $25.6 million from slot machines in March compared to $27.4 million a year earlier. March slots revenue at The Meadows, in Washington County, fell from $21.6 million in March 2013 to $19.9 million last month, according to figures from the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board.
Presque Isle Downs and Casino and Harrah's Philadelphia Casino and Racetrack were the biggest losers, each down nearly 13 percent. Valley Forge Casino Resort, however, reported an 18 percent gain.
Pennsylvania's tax revenue for March from slot machines was nearly $116 million.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.