Pittsburgh council considers $65,930 settlement in police car crash
Pittsburgh City Council introduced legislation on Tuesday that, if approved, would authorize a $65,930 legal settlement with a West View couple who claim a police sergeant ran a red light and crashed into their van as he responded to an emergency call.
Pittsburgh would pay Raymond and Catherine Burke $40,559.50, plus $25,370.50 in attorney and professional fees to settle the suit, according to the legislation.
The Burkes sued the city and the officer because of the June 12, 2009, incident at Crawford and Centre avenues in the Hill District. They claim they were driving through the intersection when the officer went through a red light without his siren on and struck their Ford van.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Distracted Steelers show nothing in loss to Eagles
- Records: Steelers RB Bell admitted smoking pot before traffic stop but denied being high
- Indiana Township police on lookout for loose alligator
- Utility regulator seeks $639,000 in penalties from electric supplier
- NFL could delay punishment
- Rossi: Time with Penguins taught Bylsma importance of stability
- Port Authority adjusts bus schedules
- Pitcairn police department to carry Narcan for heroin overdoses
- Art Festival on Walnut draws people to Shadyside from all over
- Gorman: Life lessons from high school football
- Youngwood shelter removes 44 dogs, 9 cats from shuttered Fayette SPCA