Orie Melvin appeal to be heard next month in Lawrence County
A three-judge Pennsylvania Superior Court panel will hear oral arguments next month on former state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin's appeal of her conviction on corruption charges.
The panel, which will meet at the Lawrence County Government Center in New Castle on May 20, will be comprised of Judges Christine Donohue, Paula Francisco Ott and Senior Judge John L. Musmanno.
A jury in May found Melvin, 58, of Marshall guilty of six counts for using her seat on the Superior Court to run her campaign for the state's highest court in 2003 and 2009.
Common Pleas Judge Lester G. Nauhaus sentenced her in October to serve three years on house arrest followed by two years of probation, ordered her to apologize to every judge in the state and to pay $128,000 in fines, restitution and court costs. Nauhaus stayed the sentence a month later so she wouldn't receive credit for time served.
Melvin is seeking a new trial based on 20 issues, including whether there was enough evidence to convict her, whether a judge approved search warrants that were too broadly defined, and whether Nauhaus deprived her of a fair trial. She also claims that the apology-writing portion of her sentence is unconstitutional.
Melvin is one of three sisters convicted of using political office for personal gain.
Former state Sen. Jane Orie, 53, of McCandless was released from prison in February after serving the minimum of her 2½- to 10-year prison sentence on charges of forgery, conflict of interest and theft of services.
Janine Orie, 59, of McCandless, a former Melvin staffer, is serving one year of house arrest for her role in her sisters' schemes.
Adam Brandolph is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-391-0927 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Roundup: Keurig strikes deal with Kraft on coffee brands; more
- Harrison’s 5 RBIs help Pirates pound Brewers
- Lopsided loss to Eagles shows Steelers have issues aplenty
- Steelers notebook: Keisel always hoped to return
- ‘Caring hands’ reach out to Manor woman with crippling disease
- White House ricochets in nonprofits’ birth control coverage fray
- Sandusky cover-up case unusually shrouded
- Thousands of American steel jobs believed lost to import surge
- New-Ken Arnold will have new-look school security
- Advocacy group requests investigation of Chrysler power system failures
- Health system with patients in Mercer County victim of hackers