Judge says Corbett primary challenger can stay on ballot, appeal planned
Gov. Tom Corbett has a primary opponent on May 20, for now.
A Commonwealth Court judge ruled on Tuesday that Republican challenger Bob Guzzardi can remain on the ballot, but an appeal is in the works.
In March, petitioners filed a challenge against Guzzardi's candidacy, alledging that he did not have enough valid signatures on his nomination petition to run for governor. Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt denied the challenge. Lawrence Tabas, the attorney for the petitioners, said they intend to file an appeal “very promptly” with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
The Republican Party of Pennsylvania backed the four petitioners who filed the court challenge.
Tabas would not comment on the content of Leavitt's decision, citing the pending litigation.
Though some signatures were struck during the court's review process, Guzzardi maintained enough to exceed the 2,000-signature threshold, including at least 100 from each of 10 different counties.
Guzzardi is unavailable for comment until Wednesday evening because of Passover, said his attorney, Gretchen Coles Sterns. In a statement, she called Leavitt's ruling a victory for the democratic process and Republican primary voters.
Melissa Daniels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8511 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.