Wrongfully arrested man sues city of Pittsburgh, police
Two Pittsburgh police officers ignored clear evidence that a library security guard was innocent when they arrested him on Sept. 16 for the armed robbery of Dana's Bakery in Homewood, the man claims in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday.
DeAndre Brown, 26, of Lincoln-Larimer is suing the city, Detective Nicholas Bobbs, Officer Frank Welling and as yet unnamed police supervisors for false arrest, wrongful imprisonment, malicious prosecution and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
A city spokesman couldn't be reached for comment.
Brown, a security guard at the Carnegie Library in Homewood, was attending a work-related seminar four miles away at the main branch in Oakland on Sept. 10 when the bakery was robbed, the lawsuit says.
Despite video surveillance, sign-in sheets and eyewitnesses confirming he was at the seminar, police charged him with the robbery based on a bakery employee identifying Brown, a frequent customer, as the robber when he came into the store the next day, the lawsuit says.
Brown spent 36 days in jail and another 13 days on electronic monitoring until the District Attorney's Office withdrew the charges, the lawsuit says.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Westmoreland women stole thousands to finance dog show appearances
- Pirates’ Worley tosses 4-hit shutout vs. Giants
- Pirates expect high prices in trade market
- Steelers notebook: Team hasn’t called on Keisel, Harrison yet
- Steelers hoping that youth movement breathes life into team
- Police say naked woman stabs three women during street fight in McKees Rocks
- Pittsburgh Brewing tries to reconnect with region, return to glory days
- Inside the ropes: Shazier shows off speed
- Glassport Scout completes Eagle Project
- Steelers linebacker Spence confident he can avoid injury setbacks
- White Oak man ordered to pay fine in gambling ring case