Police accuse man of attempting to lure teen in Jeannette
A Penn Township man was jailed on Sunday for an alleged attempt to lure a teenage girl into his pickup in Jeannette.
Bobby J. Williams, 45, was arrested late Sunday afternoon after an investigation by city police and Penn Township Police.
Residents tipped off police about the luring attempt that occurred in the 200 block of South Seventh Street, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed by Jeannette Patrolman Justin Scalzo.
The girl was frightened “because the man was staring at her and she felt he wanted her to get into his truck,” Scalzo said.
Friends of the girl and other witnesses reportedly watched as Williams “circled the block about five to six times, staring at her and other teenagers,” Scalzo said.
When one resident approached Williams and asked why he was in the neighborhood, police said Williams replied, “I'm looking for a little girl to pick up.”
Witnesses provided police with the registration on Williams' blue pickup.
During an interview with police, Williams said he was just “saying hello,” to the teenagers, Scalzo reported. When officers pressed the question of whether Williams was looking to have sex with a juvenile, he replied “yes,” but said he didn't think he would have gone through with it, Scalzo wrote in the affidavit.
Williams was jailed after failing to post $15,000 bond set by Jeannette District Judge Joseph DeMarchis. He scheduled a preliminary hearing for May 1.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Predators winger Neal caught ‘blindsided’ by trade from Penguins
- Steelers’ Adams delivers in pinch against Texans
- Rossi: Middling Steelers must make a statement
- Ferrante cyanide trial resumes with ER doctor testifying
- Red Wings rally, shock Penguins in overtime
- Nationwide drug ring was centered in Homewood, prosecutor says
- Primanti Bros. to mail sandwiches nationwide
- Steelers free safety Mitchell is still settling into role on defense
- Park service reports ‘significant losses’ of Flight 93 memorial collection in Oct. 3 fire
- LaBar: A memo to WWE critics
- Federal grand jury reviewing Liquor Control Board violations, sources tell Trib