Bomb threat at Hempfield Area High School cancels evening events
Hempfield Area High School was expected to be open for classes on Wednesday, a day after a bomb threat was found written on a bathroom stall, the acting superintendent said on Tuesday.
Bomb-sniffing dogs went through the building overnight, and state police at Greensburg began investigating the threat shortly after it was discovered, Barbara Marin said.
“Bomb 4/30” was written on a first-floor girls' bathroom stall, district officials said.
The district posted a letter from Marin on its website after the message was discovered.
“With what occurred at Franklin Regional, people are extremely sensitive about this,” Marin said. “That's why we felt it was necessary to let people know what is occurring and that we contacted law enforcement.”
A Franklin Regional sophomore, Alex Hribal, 16, is charged with taking two 8-inch knives to his high school on April 9 and stabbing 20 students and a security guard.
Sports practices were canceled on Tuesday night at Hempfield High School because the dogs were being taken through the building, Marin said.
“When the dogs are sweeping the building, you don't want a lot of people around,” she said.
A sports banquet was moved from the high school to another school.
The school was not evacuated on Tuesday because the message stated the bomb would go off on Wednesday, Marin added.
If school is canceled on Wednesday — and Marin doubted that — parents and students will be notified through the usual communication means, she said.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.