Pine-Richland teachers considering a strike
The Pine-Richland Education Association voted to authorize a strike Wednesday night, though teachers say they'll try to avoid the picket line.
The union will continue to negotiate with the Pine-Richland School Board. Negotiations have been ongoing for more than two years.
“No one wants a strike,” union President Trent Matteson said. “However, in making this decision, the membership of the PREA has clearly indicated to the board that we will take any and all steps available to us under Pennsylvania law in order to reach a contract settlement that treats all members of our union fairly and equitably.”
District officials did not comment on Thursday. The district's negotiations committee, made up of school board members, meets again on Monday.
The district wants to freeze pay for teachers at the top of the salary schedule, increase how much they contribute out-of-pocket for their health insurance, and remove an early-retirement incentive the union proposed and touted as a cost-cutting measure.
“Teachers in Pine-Richland are very concerned that through the life of the contract they will lose competitiveness with other school districts in the North Hills area,” said Fritz Fekete, a consultant for the union from the Pennsylvania State Education Association.
A fact-finder in March issued a report recommending annual pay be set at $41,798 for a first-year teacher with a bachelor's degree and at $95,650 for an 18-year teacher with a doctorate, the top salary.
The teachers' contract expired at the end of June 2012. They have been working under the terms of that contract since then. The union represents about 335 teachers.
Rachel Farkas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-779-6902 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.