Council takes first step toward moving more money to pave Pittsburgh roads
Pittsburgh City Council agreed unanimously on Wednesday to spend more money this year on paving winter-ravaged streets.
Council gave preliminary approval to Mayor Bill Peduto's plan for moving $1.8 million from capital projects — including dog parks, spray parks and firefighter equipment — to street paving. Council is scheduled for a final vote next week.
Peduto Deputy Chief of Staff John Fournier told council members that the cash would be redirected from completed projects or from budget line items that have an excess from prior years.
“We went through our prior-year bond funds and identified funds that could be reallocated,” Fournier said.
Nearly 64 percent of Pittsburgh's 866 miles of asphalt streets have the lowest road surface rating: zero. The city budgeted $7.2 million to pave about 29 miles this year. The extra money would permit paving 40 miles and bring total spending to about $9 million.
Public Works Director Mike Gable said his department used a computerized system to rate each street, with input from street inspectors and complaints from residents, to determine the 2014 paving schedule.
“All that builds into what streets get done,” he said.
Peduto's street is not on the list.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.