Another Chatham administrator leaving post
Chatham University's chief academic officer, Wenying Xu, will leave the school in June to become provost of Jacksonville University in Florida, Chatham officials announced on Thursday.
The announcement occurs one week after Chatham trustees voted to admit men to the 145-year-old women's college in Shadyside, and a week after Karol Dean, dean of the women's college at Chatham, announced her resignation.
Chatham spokesman Bill Campbell said Xu's resignation was not related to the trustees' vote to admit men.
“(Xu) was a big supporter of the coed decision and was part of the process. She'd been in Florida before and has a husband and a young son there. For her, this is going back home. And it's a bigger university,” Campbell said.
Xu could not be reached for comment.
Jacksonville, which is coed, has an enrollment of 4,157, compared with 2,170 at Chatham.
Like Dean, Xu had been at Chatham for two years. And like Xu, Dean left to accept a position in a larger university as dean of the School of Social Sciences at Mercy College in metropolitan New York.
The resignations occur as Chatham prepares to reorganize its academic units in anticipation of admitting men to the undergraduate college in fall 2015.
“We're just starting the process,” Campbell said.
Chatham officials cited declining enrollment in the women's college and increasing costs as among the reasons for going coed. The university admits men to its graduate and professional education programs.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- NFL coaches weigh in on Polamalu’s legacy
- Hit sends Penguins’ Letang to hospital
- Pirates pitchers finding success with expanded strike zone
- South Side house part of former Steeler’s end game
- Mt. Lebanon native, Iraq war hero’s action goes unrewarded
- Alvarez latest in Pirates’ revolving door at first base
- Pirates notebook: Polanco’s power outburst a matter of timing
- Probiotic bacteria help conquer ‘superbugs’
- Fire burns Fayette County recycling center
- Downie’s goal, fight spark Penguins to win over Coyotes
- Shortfalls sabotage promise of union retirees’ pensions